Published Feb 7, 2017



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Johana Paola Orozco Corredor

Camilo Andrés Arevalo

Ana María Quintero Gómez

Adriana Del Pilar Montealegre Pomar

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of feeding intolerance in at term newborns is not based on the operational definition. There are not studies on risk factors. Objective: To characterize term newborns hospitalized with a diagnosis of feeding intolerance. To develop a quality analysis about diagnostic and to establish real incidence. Design and Methods: Retrospective cohort between 2011 and 2013. Prenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum variables were analyzed as well as if the diagnosis met the criteria for the operational definition. Results: 11.3% of patients showed feeding intolerant, only 33% met the operational definition. The annual incidence was between 3.5% and 4.4%. In the characterization of the population, the most common variables were: consumption of artificial feeding (88%), maternal history of regional anesthesia (69%), jaundice (61%), male sex (58%), cesarean delivery (57 %), and hypoglycemia (53%). Conclusions: The incidence was similar to the one in other countries. 66% of patients did not meet the operational definition. Analytical depth studies exploring causal relationship are required.

Keywords

intolerance, feeding, infant term birth, risk factors.alimentación, intolerancia, recién nacido, factores de riesgo

References
1. Pfanaroff S. Feeding intolerance in the
preterm infant. Early Hum Dev. 2013.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.
2013.07.013
2. Neu J. Gastrointestinal maturation and
implications for infant feeding. Early
Hum Dev. 2007;83:767-75.
3. Carter BM. Feeding intolerance in
preterm infants and standard of care
guidelines for nursing assessments.
Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews.
2012 Dec;12(4):187-201. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1053/j.nainr.2012.09.007
4. Moore TA, Wilson ME. Feeding intolerance:
A concept analysis. Adv Neonatal
Care. 2011;11:149-54.
5. Mora E, Toussaint G, Pérez P, Marín C,
Carmona M. Alimentación enteral en el
recién nacido pretérmino y de término
con bajo peso: estado actual en México.
Gac Méd Méx [internet]. 2005;141(4).
Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.
mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid
=S0016-38132005000400006
6. Cizmeci MN, Kanburoglu MK, Akelma
AZ, Tufan N, Tatli MM. A descriptive
study of transient neonatal feeding
intolerance in a tertiary care center in
Turkey. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs.
2014;43(2):200-4. doi: 10.1111/1552-
6909.12292
7. Chowning R, Radmacher P, Lewis S, Serke
L, Pettit N, Adamkin DH. A retrospective
analysis of the effect of human milk
on prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis
and postnatal growth. J Perinatol. 2015
Dec 3. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.179.
How to Cite
Orozco Corredor, J. P., Arevalo, C. A., Quintero Gómez, A. M., & Montealegre Pomar, A. D. P. (2017). Characterization of Term Newborn with Diagnosis of Feeding Intolerance in First Week of Life. Universitas Medica, 57(4), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.umed57-4.crni
Section
Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)