Published Jul 15, 2016



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


Reinaldo Grueso Angulo

Antonio Jose Bonilla Ramirez

Ginna Milena Moreno Oliveros

Alejandra Sanín Hoyos

Vera Winograd Gómez

Maura Alejandra Rivera Herrera

Viviana Orejarena Anzola

Ana Maria Luna Duran

Veronica Laverde Zerda

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Infraclavicular brachial-plexus block provides complete, effective and safe anesthesia for upper-limb surgical interventions from the distal third of the arm onwards. This study evaluated the possible compromise of diaphragmatic motility using standardized ultrasonographic evaluation in patients who underwent this anesthetic technique. Methods: 53 patients were recruited for upper-limb orthopedic surgery distal to the shoulder. Bilateral ultrasonographic exploration of the diaphragm was made both before and after the regional anesthesia was performed. Diaphragmatic motility measurements were taken in forced inspiration and expiration utilizing a convex, low frequency transducer. The deepest point of diaphragmatic visualization was identified and followed during inspiration and expiration maneuvers using M Mode Ultrasonography. Results: A standardized measurement of diaphragmatic motility was performed in every patient both before and after the block was undertaken. We obtained both qualitative and quantitative measurements obtaining an average absolute value of 6.63 cm (SD ±0,35) and 6.75cm (SD ±0.42), respectively. A statistical Student t test was performed demonstrating no significant difference in diaphragm movement before and after the anesthetic procedure. Discussion:  The use of ultrasonography in the evaluation of diaphragmatic motility is a
simple, non-invasive and reproducible tool. There is no evidence of diaphragmatic paralysis after infraclavicular brachial-plexus block. However, the result may be related toe the low prevalence of this complication and with the absence of normal, standardized values of the variables of interest.

Keywords

Ultrasound, Brachial Plexus, Nerve Block, Diaphragmatic Paralysis, Regional AnesthesiaUltrasonografía, Plexo Braquial, Bloqueo Nervioso, Parálisis Diafragmática, Anestesia Regional

References
1. Mian A, Chaudhry I, Huang R, Rizk E, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Brachial plexus anesthesia: A review of the relevant anatomy, complications, and anatomical variations. Clinical Anatomy. 2014. p. 210–21.
2. Monkowski DP, Vitale F. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2006;10:106–9.
3. Bonilla AJ, Grueso R, Peñate EE. Parálisis diafragmática secundaria a bloqueo de plexo braquial vía infraclavicular para cirugía de miembro superior. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2011;39(4):589–94.
4. Yang CW, Jung SM, Kwon HU, Kang PS, Cho CK, Choi HJ. Transient hemidiaphragmatic paresis after ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. J Clin Anesth [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2013;25(6):496–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.04.012
5. Stadlmeyer W, Neubauer J, Finkl RO, Groh J. [Unilateral phrenic nerve paralysis after vertical infraclavicular plexus block] . Der Anaesthesist. 2000. p. 1030–3.
6. Gentili ME, Deleuze A, Estèbe JP, Lebourg M, Ecoffey C. Severe respiratory failure after infraclavicular block with 0.75% ropivacaine: A case report. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:459–61.
7. Rettig HC, Gielen MJM, Boersma E, Klein J, Groen GJ. Vertical infraclavicular block of the brachial plexus: Effects on hemidiaphragmatic movement and ventilatory function. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:529–35.
8. Jandard C, Gentili ME, Girard F, Ecoffey C, Heck M, Laxenaire MC, et al. Infraclavicular block with lateral approach and nerve stimulation: Extent of anesthesia and adverse effects. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:37–42.
9. Kim SH, Na S, Choi JS, Na SH, Shin S, Koh SO. An evaluation of diaphragmatic movement by M-mode sonography as a predictor of pulmonary dysfunction after upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1349–54.
10. Lloyd T, Tang Y-M, Benson MD, King S. Diaphragmatic paralysis: the use of M mode ultrasound for diagnosis in adults. Spinal cord Off J Int Med Soc Paraplegia. 2006;44:505–8.
11. Urvoas E, Pariente D, Fausser C, Lipsich J, Taleb R, Devictor D. Diaphragmatic paralysis in children: Diagnosis by TM-mode ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24:564–8.
12. Balaji S, Kunovsky P, Sullivan I. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis after operation for congenital heart disease. Br Heart J. 1990;64:20–2.
13. Summerhill EM, El-Sameed YA, Glidden TJ, McCool FD. Monitoring recovery from diaphragm paralysis with ultrasound. Chest. 2008;133:737–43.
14. Sarwal, Aarti (Neurology and Critical Care WFS of M, Walker, Francis (Neurology WFS of M. Neuromuscular Ultrasound for Evaluation of the Diaphragm. Muscle Nerve. 2013;47(3):319–29.
15. Boussuges A, Gole Y, Blanc P. Diaphragmatic motion studied by M-mode ultrasonography. Chest. 2009;135:391–400.
16. Lloyd T, Tang Y-M, Benson MD, King S. Diaphragmatic paralysis: the use of M mode ultrasound for diagnosis in adults. Spinal cord : the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia. 2006 p. 505–8.
17. Testa A, Soldati G, Giannuzzi R, Berardi S, Portale G, Gentiloni Silveri N. Ultrasound M-Mode assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics by anterior transverse scanning in healthy subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(1):44–52.
18. Angulo RG, Hoyos AS, Ramírez AJB, Carreño AG. Comparación entre la técnica de multi-inyección y la inyección única con localización del nervio mediano en el bloqueo infraclavicular para cirugía del miembro superior Multi-injection vs . single injection technique with localization of the medial nerve . 2010;
19. Macfarlane A, Anderson K. Infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. Contin Educ Anaesthesia, Crit Care Pain. 2009;9(5):139–43.
How to Cite
Grueso Angulo, R., Bonilla Ramirez, A. J., Moreno Oliveros, G. M., Sanín Hoyos, A., Winograd Gómez, V., Rivera Herrera, M. A., Orejarena Anzola, V., Luna Duran, A. M., & Laverde Zerda, V. (2016). ultrasoud-guided diaphragmatic motility evaluation in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery of the upper limb under regional anesthesia using infraclavicular block. Universitas Medica, 57(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.umed57-2.emdu
Section
Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)