Published Aug 1, 2023



PLUMX
Almetrics
 
Dimensions
 

Google Scholar
 
Search GoogleScholar


José Fernando Plata Puyana

Andrés de Greiff Correa

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Abstract

Based on the OECD literature and the analysis of the cases EBSA, EPM, Electricaribe, Electrohuila and Emgesa-Efigas, the authors explore the benefits of complementarity and the problem of inconsistency that are produced by the coexistence between the Superintendency of Public Services and the Superintendency of Industry and Commerce as enforcement authorities for the promotion and protection of competition. The authors argue that the current coexistence generates inefficiencies in the functioning of the Government, a situation that could be overcome if Law 142 of 1994 is modified in the sense of equating the enforcement tools. In addition, to overcome the risk of inconsistency, it is necessary for both authorities to advance in the alternatives recommended by the OECD to improve inter-institutional coordination, such as: (i) agreements to share information; (ii) exchange of officials; and (iii) preparation of joint reports, among others.

Keywords

competition, energy, natural gas, market manipulation, public servicescompetencia, energía, gas natural, manipulación mercados, servicios públicos

References
Andrew I. Gavil, William E. Kovacic & Jonathan B. Baker, Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concepts and Problems in Competition Policy, 2.° ed. (Thomson West, 2008).

Alfonso Miranda Londoño, El derecho de la competencia en la ley de servicios públicos domiciliarios (Bogotá, 1997). https://centrocedec.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/servicios-pc3bablicos.pdf

Comisión de la Comunidad Europea, Directrices sobre la Evaluación de las Concentraciones No Horizontales con Arreglo al Reglamento del Consejo sobre el Control de las Concentraciones entre Empresas, Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea (2008/C 265/7) (2008).

ECSIM, Análisis del impacto de la regulación y de las estructuras productiva e industrial del sector de energía eléctrica sobre el nivel final de las tarifas y precios del servicio de energía eléctrica en Colombia, Informe Completo (2013). https://acolgen.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ANALISIS-DEL-IMPACTO-DE-LA-REGULACION-Y-DE-LAS-ESTRUCTURAS-PRODUCTIVA-E-INDUSTRIAL-DEL-SECTOR-DE-ENERGIA.pdf.

Ian Ayres & John Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation: Trascending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992).

Inés Macho-Stadler & J. David Pérez-Castrillo, An Introduction to the Economics of Information – Incentives and Contracts, 2.° ed. (Oxford University Press, 2001).

José Plata Puyana, Marielena Rozo Covaleda & Alejandro Ibarra Ibarra, Aplicación de la regulación sobre promoción de la competencia en los servicios públicos domiciliarios por la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, En Gabriel Ibarra Pardo, Alfonso Miranda Londoño & Carlos Andrés Uribe Piedrahita, capítulo XVI. El derecho de la Competencia (Ed. Legis, 2022).

N. Gregory Mankiw, Principios de economía, en Meza, Staines & Carril Villarreal, (Cengage Learning, 6.° ed., 2012).

OCDE. Restructuring Public Utilities for Competition. Annex. Recommendation of the OECD Council concerning Structural Separation in Regulated Industries as approved by Council on 26 April 2001 [C(2001)78/FINAL - C/M(2001)9/PROV].

OCDE. Report on Experiences with Structural Separation. Restructuring Public Utilities for Competition. [C(2016)11 - C/M(2016)3].

OCDE. Directorate For Financial and Enterprise Affairs - Competition Committee. Executive Summary of the roundtable on Independent Sector Regulators DAF/COMP/WP2/M(2019)2/ANN2/FINA.

OCDE. Independent Sector Regulators and their Relationship with Competition Authorities”. DAF/COMP/WP2(2019)3. 2019.

Paul Krugman & Robin Wells, Economics (Worth Publishers, 2006).

Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave & Martin Lode, Understanding Regulation - Theory, Strategy and Practice (Editorial Oxford University Press, 2.° ed., 2012).

Steven C. Salop & David T. Scheffman, Raising Rivals’ Costs, Working Paper 81, Bureau of Economics - Federal Trade Commission (Washington, enero, 1983).

Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, Herramienta para el Monitoreo del Mercado Eléctrico (2016). https://www.sic.gov.co/sites/default/files/files/monitoreoMEM_documentodiscusion.pdf

Thomas G. Krattenmaker & Steven C. Salop, Anticompetitive Exclusion: Raising Rivals’ Costs to Achieve Power Over Price, 96 Yale L.J. 209 (diciembre, 1986).
How to Cite
Plata Puyana, J. F., & de Greiff Correa, A. (2023). Competition in Electricity and Natural Gas Markets, which Authority has Jjurisdiction?. Vniversitas, 72. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj72.cmee
Section
Edición ordinaria