CORPORAL INTERVENTIONS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CO DE OF 2004, ANALYSIS OF THE C-822 SENTENCE OF 2005 OF THE COLOMBIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
The thematic one of this article is a critical study of the conception that of the different modalities from corporal interventions expresses the Colombian Corte Constitucional in the C-822/2005 sentence. In this study, the position of the Corte Constitucional is criticized when considering, with base in the proportionality principle (balancing test), that diffuse public interests can have greater weight than the fundamental guarantee of the prohibition of the cruel, cruel and degrading treatment. Characteristics, a foundation and limits for these measures set out. The paper of the procedural burden like alternative to the use of the effective force in the application of these interventions is analyzed. Also, the probatory relevance of these measures is examined.
corporal interventions, expert test, fundamental rights, proportional principle (balancing test), procedural burden, effective physical force, probatory relevanceintervenciones corporales, prueba pericial, derechos fundamentales, proporcionalidad, cargas y obligaciones procesales, fuerza física efectiva, eficacia probatoria, Código de Procedimiento Penal, Corte Constitucional colombiana